The Teaching Front
Tomorrow in my American History 120 courses we’ll finish up, hopefully, the French-Indian War and move on into the Pre-Revolutionary Era. This semester I’ll move away from the standard “This Act, that Act and the Other Act followed by a massacre or two,” into something a bit more intellectual. I’m going to try and show the students what the Founding Fathers were thinking as they pondered their situation with Great Britain. That will entail a brief lesson on the Romans followed by a heavy dose of Locke.
In my American History 121 we’ll finish up the Spanish-American War, cover the situation in the Philippines (the Nam before the Nam as I often call it) before showcasing a couple of cultural artifacts from the era.
The artifacts are Rudyard Kipling’s poem The White Man’s Burden and Mark Twain’s The War Prayer. In Twain’s case it was recently adapted into an animated film which is (hopefully still) at YouTube. I believe the makers of that piece were more interested in the antiwar value they could get out of it than anything else and I’ve got my own issues with the fact that Twain put it into a trunk rather than risk his writing career by upsetting folks of the era but it will be handy in any case.
But why Kipling? Didn’t I get the memo that he is a Bad man, Persona Non Grata in the Halls of Academia? Don’t I know that what I am supposed to be doing is throwing him into the memory hole along with that report Winston Smith was working on in 1984?
Yeah, I got the memo. I’ll read the poem to my students anyway.
Why?
First, it is the classic imperialist argument of the era, summed up into a neat little poem. I can read it, dissect it while I read it, and explain to the students what is going on. They’ll pick up the racism easily enough (just consider the title) but I think they’ll miss other points.
Second, to ignore the poem and speak in vague, broad generalizations about the concept of “white man’s burden” is to reduce it to an intellectual concept with zero emotional punch or ability to generate resonance. It also makes it just a little too easy for the students to brush it off as unimportant.
Finally, I’m always uncomfortable with this notion that there is such a thing as forbidden knowledge or knowledge that is inherently evil. I think that is what bothers me about the Teach Peace Not War types in academia. Orwell had a saying for that too.
Ignorance is strength. Some twits will say that by reading the poem I agree with the message.
As for Mark Twain’s piece, I’ll get to showcase an example of anti-imperialist thinking in the U.S. during this period. What Twain’s piece is missing is the racist side of the anti-imperialist argument, namely that we shouldn’t dilute and weaken ourselves by moving out into the world. Those people will want the same rights we have, you know? Then there is the miscegenation issue as well, which the anti-imperialist types were worried about.
The Writing Front
I think my last story crawled off into a hole and died on me. That happens with so many of them. So yesterday I started on something else. I’m mainly writing this for Terri’s Creative Writing class and if I can find a market for it, fine. If not then fuck it as I am mighty tired of the Fail Nazi bullshit that goes on in the American Science Fiction Community.
For now the story is simply titled Edward. The word count is 1600 words. We’ll see how it goes.
So it goes.
Respects,
Steven Francis Murphy
Author of The Limb Knitter and Tearing Down Tuesday
North Kansas City, Missouri

11 comments
September 21, 2010 at 10:39 pm
yankeedog
Damn right. Part of studying history is studying the thought processes of the time. Read them the Kipling.
There were a lot of ‘little wars’ that the US was involved in at about the time of the Philippine Insurrection: The Boxer Rebellion (interesting example of coalition warfare), Haiti (which we go to about every decade), Panama, and Mexico. They each get about a paragraph in the average history book-but they do point out that the US was as adept at ‘gunboat diplomacy’ as the major European powers.
September 22, 2010 at 12:57 am
sfmurphy1971
You do a course on foreign intervention from 1890 to 1940, YD. I really don’t have time to get into the others that you mention. I do cover Panama as an additional example but that is about it.
And yes, I’ll read ‘em some Kipling. I’d read them some Tommy Atkins but I think it’d be lost on them.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
September 22, 2010 at 5:05 pm
Brad R. Torgersen
Murph, I don’t think I’ve ever asked, but what’s your “list” of markets look like? Where do you send?
September 22, 2010 at 10:26 pm
Brad R. Torgersen
Oh, and I posted on my blog that I went down to B&N today and bought not one, not two, but THREE titles by Elizabeth Moon. The slagging she has endured — baseless, all of it — disgusts me. I felt physically compelled to walk in and vote with my wallet, which is far mightier than the keyboard. Like I said on my blog, sometimes, you just have to stand up against punks. Especially the FaceRail variety.
September 22, 2010 at 11:47 pm
Barnesm
I think its essential to read the authors/poets/diarists of the time, some of them read timelessly as if written today (if you ignore the costs of things Raymond Chandler could be writing contemporay noir) and others write so in their present that they capture a cultural mindset so perfectly that it gives us a glimpse into a past which can longer be experienced.
Good to see you choosing to use the best tool for the job (Kipling ) and devil take the hindmost.
September 23, 2010 at 3:15 am
sfmurphy1971
Brad, I’m pondering how to answer your former. Per your later, come payday I’ll go buy a copy of Sassinak and Speed of Dark. I may pick up a third book as well.
I guess Wiscon decided not to rescind their Guest of Honor invite. Predictably, the Fail Nazis are complaining about that and planning on protests, walkouts and other such things.
Frankly, I sort a wish they HAD uninvited her. It would have verified every suspicion I have about Wiscon.
Barnes, a teaching peer of mine says you have to take the past on its own terms. Kipling included. I agree with him.
Of course, I could talk about the baker and the candlestick maker but social history bores me to tears. If I gave a shit about that sort of thing I would have gone for a BA in Journalism, not History.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
September 23, 2010 at 5:37 am
Therbs
Once again those who would deny reading that Kipling poem and accuse you of being in accord with the inherent message simply don’t understand how a point of view can work in studying history. The numbnuts simply see something which isn’t up to current day standards and start up with the finger pointing. While the poem may not necessarily be a primary source historical document it is an echo of its time and thus has value in understanding the period. They simply don’t understand that while you may be quoting a writer it doesn’t mean you hold the same values. To me its like those who decry Birmo as some sort of right wing militarist because he writes action and combat scenes using the p.o.v. of particpants. They take the line that because he writes explodey goodness then he wants to blow things up. Hmmm, now where has that sort of thinking cropped up before?
September 23, 2010 at 9:33 pm
sfmurphy1971
Yeah, anyone who thinks Birmo is a right wing militarist is demonstrating how little they know of the man.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
September 24, 2010 at 2:39 am
Brad R. Torgersen
Murph, did Wiscon make an official announcement, concerning Moon? If they defy the FaceRailers on this one… My respect for Wiscon’s integrity will go into orbit!
September 24, 2010 at 12:43 pm
sfmurphy1971
Brad, as I understand it, Wiscon has reaffirmed their invite to Moon as GoH and she is still planning on going.
And as I understand it, the fail nazis have every intention of protesting and engaging in all sorts of other activities to make Moon feel as unwelcome as possible.
You know, I hope they protest to the max. I hope they pull every stunt in the book. I hope they record their behavior and put it on YouTube.
I think it will finally show that what is more important to those folks is not their “cause” but the theater, melodrama and bullying than anything else.
Respects,
Murph
On the Outer Marches
September 26, 2010 at 1:52 pm
unpossible
Was it Aristotle who said something along the lines of intelligence is about entertaining ideas without necessarily believing in them? Dunno- someone smarter than me, anyway.
Kipling is a great poet, though.